People v. Blakney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blakney

286 A.D.2d 801, 730 N.Y.S.2d 260, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D.2d 801 (People v. Blakney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blakney, 286 A.D.2d 801, 730 N.Y.S.2d 260, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered October 22, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to IV2 to 3 years in prison to run consecutive to a sentence he was then serving. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed [802]*802and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered October 22, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to IV2 to 3 years in prison to run consecutive to a sentence he was then serving. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed [802]*802and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 801, 730 N.Y.S.2d 260, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blakney-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack