People v. Blakey
This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02539 (People v. Blakey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Blakey |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 02539 |
| Decided on April 28, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 28, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
2019-05199
2019-05200
(Ind. No. 2225A/17, S.C.I. No. 1308/18)
v
Maurice Blakey, appellant. Mark Diamond, New York, NY, for appellant.
Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (John B. Collins, J.), both rendered September 26, 2018, as amended October 10, 2018, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 2225A/2017, and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 1308/2018, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
ORDERED that the judgments, as amended, are affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his pleas of guilty were not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his pleas or otherwise raise the issue before the County Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Xajapajcuc, 191 AD3d 811; People v Currier, 191 AD3d 695). In any event, this contention is without merit, as the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered into the negotiated pleas of guilty (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780).
CHAMBERS, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY, LASALLE and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 NY Slip Op 02539, 143 N.Y.S.3d 223, 193 A.D.3d 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blakey-nyappdiv-2021.