People v. Blair

2017 NY Slip Op 7269, 154 A.D.3d 872, 62 N.Y.S.3d 283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Blair. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D.3d 1105
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 2017·No. 2015-04567·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), imposed May 12, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925 [2012]; People v Minnerly, 127 AD3d 788 [2015]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Blair, 2017 NY Slip Op 7269, 154 A.D.3d 872, 62 N.Y.S.3d 283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 7269 (People v. Blair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Minnerly
127 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)