People v. Blair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blair

41 A.D.2d 649, 340 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5200

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 649 (People v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blair, 41 A.D.2d 649, 340 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 19, 1971 on resentence, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, unarmed, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him nunc pro tune as of August 17,1966 to Elmira Reformatory for an indefinite period. Appeal dismissed as moot. Defendant raises only the claims .that he did not receive treatment in a reformatory facility despite being sentenced to the' Elmira Reformatory and that because he was technically, a reformatory inmate ■he was denied good-time credit toward his maximum expiration date. However, since-he has already served his sentence these claims are of no practical significance. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 19, 1971 on resentence, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, unarmed, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him nunc pro tune as of August 17,1966 to Elmira Reformatory for an indefinite period. Appeal dismissed as moot. Defendant raises only the claims .that he did not receive treatment in a reformatory facility despite being sentenced to the' Elmira Reformatory and that because he was technically, a reformatory inmate ■he was denied good-time credit toward his maximum expiration date. However, since-he has already served his sentence these claims are of no practical significance. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 649, 340 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blair-nyappdiv-1973.