People v. Blackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blackson

54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 718 (People v. Blackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blackson, 54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered October 30, 1974, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed (see People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 117, 119). On this record, the undercover agent’s identification of the defendant was independent of the identification procedure and would have been admissible at the trial even had the defendant been able to establish that the photo array was improper. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered October 30, 1974, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed (see People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 117, 119). On this record, the undercover agent’s identification of the defendant was independent of the identification procedure and would have been admissible at the trial even had the defendant been able to establish that the photo array was improper. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blackson-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack