People v. Blackmon
This text of 728 N.W.2d 873 (People v. Blackmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roy BLACKMON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall include among the issues to be considered: (1) whether the Court of Appeals, on direct appeal, erred in failing to apply the "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" standard that is applied to preserved federal constitutional error, Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); (2) if so, whether the errors committed at trial were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) whether the defendant is entitled to postappeal relief under MCR 6.508(D)(3).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 N.W.2d 873, 477 Mich. 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blackmon-mich-2007.