People v. Biumi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Biumi

50 A.D.2d 931, 377 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Biumi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Biumi, 50 A.D.2d 931, 377 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed August 22, 1975, upon his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being one year in the Suffolk County jail, to run consecutively with a sentence previously imposed in the County Court, Nassau County. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by changing to concurrent the provision that it is consecutive with the sentence imposed in Nassau County. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed August 22, 1975, upon his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being one year in the Suffolk County jail, to run consecutively with a sentence previously imposed in the County Court, Nassau County. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by changing to concurrent the provision that it is consecutive with the sentence imposed in Nassau County. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 931, 377 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-biumi-nyappdiv-1975.