People v. Birtha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Birtha

111 A.D.2d 763, 489 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50009

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 763 (People v. Birtha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Birtha, 111 A.D.2d 763, 489 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), each rendered November 17, 1983, convicting him of [764]*764assault in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, attempted rape in the first degree, and attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), each rendered November 17, 1983, convicting him of [764]*764assault in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, attempted rape in the first degree, and attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 763, 489 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-birtha-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack