People v. Birmingham

212 N.E.2d 780, 16 N.Y.2d 984, 265 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1053
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*985 Judgment modified and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, so as to provide for the imposition of a sentence to run concurrently instead of consecutively and, as so modified, affirmed. (Penal Law, § 1938.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan. Judges Dye and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm. (See People ex rel. Maurer v. Jackson, 2 N Y 2d 259; People v. Erickson, 302 N. Y. 461; cf. People v. Di Lapo, 14 N Y 2d 170.) The consecutive sentence was permissible under section 1938 of the Penal Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Birmingham, 212 N.E.2d 780, 16 N.Y.2d 984, 265 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1053 (N.Y. 1965).

212 N.E.2d 780 (People v. Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hatch
105 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)