People v. Birch (Anton)
This text of 70 Misc. 3d 144(A) (People v. Birch (Anton)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
People v Birch (2021 NY Slip Op 50199(U)) [*1]
| People v Birch (Anton) |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 50199(U) [70 Misc 3d 144(A)] |
| Decided on March 12, 2021 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on March 12, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Higgitt, J.P., Brigantti, Hagler, JJ.
570379/15
against
Anton Birch, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.H.O.), rendered February 3, 2015, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.H.O.), rendered February 3, 2015, affirmed.
The information charging disorderly conduct (see Penal Law § 240.20) was not jurisdictionally defective. Nonhearsay allegations established every element of the offense and defendant's commission thereof (see CPL 100.40[1][c]; People v Middleton, 35 NY3d 952, 954 [2020]). Defendant's intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly create a risk thereof (see People v Weaver, 16 NY3d 123, 128 [2011]) could be readily inferred from allegations that he refused to comply with the routine magnetometer search procedure at the Bronx County Criminal Court building on a specified weekday afternoon during the hours of court; used obscene and abusive language, i.e., "Why you going through my shit. This is bullshit. Fuck this shit;" and "refused to comply with several lawful orders to refrain from the disruptive conduct, to comply with the voluntary search or vacate the area" (see People v Lee, 55 Misc 3d 138[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50521[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1092 [2017]; see also Matter of Monique Elizabeth J. v Orlandro D., 145 AD3d 557 [2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 901 [2017]; Norasteh v State of New York, 44 AD3d 576 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 709 [2008]; People v Clarke, 34 Misc 3d 159[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50438[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 958 [2012]).
All concur.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Clerk of the Court
Decision Date: March 12, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 Misc. 3d 144(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 50199(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-birch-anton-nyappterm-2021.