People v. Biochemical Procedures, Inc.

291 N.E.2d 393, 31 N.Y.2d 792, 339 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 994
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 1972·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Buricb, Scileppi, Bergan and Gibson. Judges Breitel and Jasen dissent and vote to modify and dismiss the petition in the following memorandum: The statute does not contemplate the licensing, regulation or inspection of out-of-State laboratories. The proper remedy would be legislative change with provision for such licensing and regulation and, undoubtedly, with provision for the imposition of inspection fees, to cover the extraordinary cost involved in the regulation of out-of-State laboratories.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Biochemical Procedures, Inc., 291 N.E.2d 393, 31 N.Y.2d 792, 339 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 994 (N.Y. 1972).

291 N.E.2d 393 (People v. Biochemical Procedures, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. v. Perales
172 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Home Office Reference Laboratory, Inc. v. Axelrod
127 Misc. 2d 444 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)