People v. Billinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Billinger

215 A.D.2d 770, 627 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 770 (People v. Billinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Billinger, 215 A.D.2d 770, 627 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered July 8, 1993, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not support the defendant’s contention that defense counsel was unaware of the charges against the defendant just prior to the defendant entering his plea of guilty and thus he was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel (see generally, People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457).

The defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered July 8, 1993, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not support the defendant’s contention that defense counsel was unaware of the charges against the defendant just prior to the defendant entering his plea of guilty and thus he was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel (see generally, People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457).

The defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 770, 627 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-billinger-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack