People v. Bigus
497 N.E.2d 700, 68 N.Y.2d 723, 506 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19491
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (115 AD2d 751). Unlike People v Briggins (50 NY2d 302), there was here a fraudulent intent.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Bigus, 497 N.E.2d 700, 68 N.Y.2d 723, 506 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19491 (N.Y. 1986).
497 N.E.2d 700 (People v. Bigus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thornton v. State
636 N.E.2d 140 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. DeRue
179 A.D.2d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Mooney
172 A.D.2d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Moore
171 A.D.2d 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Thomas
162 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
State v. Bedoni
779 P.2d 355 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
People v. Hennessy
133 A.D.2d 174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Mason
133 A.D.2d 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)