People v. Bigio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bigio

124 A.D.2d 907, 508 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62229

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 907 (People v. Bigio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bigio, 124 A.D.2d 907, 508 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant, an inmate at Adirondack Correctional Facility, pleaded guilty to intentionally stabbing a fellow inmate in the leg with a sharpened steel shank, in violation of Penal Law § 120.05 (7). Though defendant was dealt with as having been previously convicted of a felony, it is undisputed that a predicate felony statement was not filed or provided to him; that he neither acknowledged the legitimacy of any prior felony conviction nor was asked to controvert it; and that no hearing to determine the propriety of any such conviction was conducted. Since the provisions of CPL 400.21 have not been observed, resentencing is required (see, People v King, 114 AD2d 650, 652).

Judgment reversed, on the law, sentence imposed vacated, and matter remitted to the County Court of Essex County for resentencing in accordance with CPL 400.21. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawieh, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant, an inmate at Adirondack Correctional Facility, pleaded guilty to intentionally stabbing a fellow inmate in the leg with a sharpened steel shank, in violation of Penal Law § 120.05 (7). Though defendant was dealt with as having been previously convicted of a felony, it is undisputed that a predicate felony statement was not filed or provided to him; that he neither acknowledged the legitimacy of any prior felony conviction nor was asked to controvert it; and that no hearing to determine the propriety of any such conviction was conducted. Since the provisions of CPL 400.21 have not been observed, resentencing is required (see, People v King, 114 AD2d 650, 652).

Judgment reversed, on the law, sentence imposed vacated, and matter remitted to the County Court of Essex County for resentencing in accordance with CPL 400.21. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawieh, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D.2d 907, 508 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bigio-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack