People v. Biggs

203 A.D.2d 297, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Biggs. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 312

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered September 1, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. Viewing counsel’s performance "in its entirety, in conjunction with the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case” [298]*298(People v Vanterpool, 143 AD2d 282; see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147), we are satisfied that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Biggs, 203 A.D.2d 297, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 297 (People v. Biggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Vanterpool
143 A.D.2d 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)