People v. Biggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Biggs

203 A.D.2d 297, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 297 (People v. Biggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Biggs, 203 A.D.2d 297, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered September 1, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. Viewing counsel’s performance "in its entirety, in conjunction with the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case” [298]*298(People v Vanterpool, 143 AD2d 282; see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147), we are satisfied that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered September 1, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. Viewing counsel’s performance "in its entirety, in conjunction with the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case” [298]*298(People v Vanterpool, 143 AD2d 282; see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147), we are satisfied that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 297, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-biggs-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack