People v. Beyah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Beyah

302 A.D.2d 981, 754 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1075

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of Cayuga County Court (Coming, J.), entered March 29, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25 [2]). Contrary.to the contention of defendant, County Court properly denied his motion seeking dismissal of the indictment based on a preindictment delay of over 12 months. We reject the contention of defendant that the delay violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see generally People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 444-445). We further reject the contention of defendant that his due process rights were violated by the preindictment delay (see generally People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 253-255). Present — Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Burns and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of Cayuga County Court (Coming, J.), entered March 29, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25 [2]). Contrary.to the contention of defendant, County Court properly denied his motion seeking dismissal of the indictment based on a preindictment delay of over 12 months. We reject the contention of defendant that the delay violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see generally People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 444-445). We further reject the contention of defendant that his due process rights were violated by the preindictment delay (see generally People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 253-255). Present — Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Burns and Hayes, JJ.

People v. Beyah, 302 A.D.2d 981, 754 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

302 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Beyah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related