People v. Beu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Beu

24 A.D.3d 1257, 805 N.Y.S.2d 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 A.D.3d 1257 (People v. Beu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Beu, 24 A.D.3d 1257, 805 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), rendered October 22, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal is valid (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]). That waiver encompasses defendant’s further contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hughes [appeal No. 1], 21 AD3d 1394 [2005]). Defendant’s contention concerning the alleged violation of CPL 400.21 is not preserved for our review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 57-58 [2000] ). In any event, we conclude that Supreme Court substantially complied with the requirements of that section (see People v Nevins, 16 AD3d 1046, 1048 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 889 [2005]; People v Bonilla, 298 AD2d 871 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 555 [2002]; People v Chaney, 284 AD2d 998 [2001] , lv denied 96 NY2d 917 [2001]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), rendered October 22, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal is valid (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]). That waiver encompasses defendant’s further contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hughes [appeal No. 1], 21 AD3d 1394 [2005]). Defendant’s contention concerning the alleged violation of CPL 400.21 is not preserved for our review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 57-58 [2000] ). In any event, we conclude that Supreme Court substantially complied with the requirements of that section (see People v Nevins, 16 AD3d 1046, 1048 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 889 [2005]; People v Bonilla, 298 AD2d 871 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 555 [2002]; People v Chaney, 284 AD2d 998 [2001] , lv denied 96 NY2d 917 [2001]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.3d 1257, 805 N.Y.S.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beu-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack