People v. Bethune

130 A.D.3d 937, 12 N.Y.S.3d 902
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 2015
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 A.D.3d 937 (People v. Bethune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bethune, 130 A.D.3d 937, 12 N.Y.S.3d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 16, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court’s supplemental charge explaining that the initial verdict was repugnant and defining murder in the second degree was improper. However, the trial transcript has since been properly resettled to reflect that the challenged portions of the charge represented transcription errors (see People v Santorelli, 95 NY2d 412, 424 [2000]; People v Williams, 2 AD3d 546 [2003]; People v Scott, 197 AD2d 646, 647 [1993]; cf. People v Laracuente, 136 AD2d 742, 744 [1988]).

The defendant also contends that his conviction of murder in the second degree was against the weight of the evidence. In [938]*938fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to that count was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Duffy and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bethune v. Russo
E.D. New York, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D.3d 937, 12 N.Y.S.3d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bethune-nyappdiv-2015.