People v. Bethea

2016 NY Slip Op 8244, 145 A.D.3d 738, 41 N.Y.S.3d 899
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 2016
Docket2014-09850
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 8244 (People v. Bethea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bethea, 2016 NY Slip Op 8244, 145 A.D.3d 738, 41 N.Y.S.3d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), dated September 24, 2014, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on October 5, 2004.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

A defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 enjoys a statutory presumption in favor of resentencing (see People v Duke, 132 AD3d 893 [2015]; People v Brown, 115 AD3d 155, 156-157 [2014] aff'd 25 NY3d 247 [2015]; People v Beasley, 47 AD3d 639, 641 [2008]). However, resentencing is not automatic, and the determination is left to the discretion of the Supreme Court (see People v Duke, 132 AD3d 893 [2015]; People v Karim, 85 AD3d 943, 944 [2011]; People v Beasley, 47 AD3d at 641).

Here, in light of the defendant’s extensive and continuous criminal history, which includes a conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, his lackluster institutional disciplinary record, and his arrest for criminal possession of a weapon while on parole, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 (see People v Duke, 132 AD3d 893 [2015]; People v Peterson, 88 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2011]; People v Overton, 86 AD3d 4, 16 [2011]; People v Karim, 85 AD3d at 944).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SAFFOLD, ROBERT, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
People v. Saffold
148 A.D.3d 1669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 8244, 145 A.D.3d 738, 41 N.Y.S.3d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bethea-nyappdiv-2016.