Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Bethea

People v. Bethea

46 A.D.3d 565, 845 N.Y.S.2d 918
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bethea. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.3d 813 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 2007·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered October 5, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[566]*566Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s untimely request for an in camera examination of the confidential informant (see People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177, 181 [1974]; People v Edwards, 95 NY2d 486 [2000]; People v Brown, 2 AD3d 1423, 1424 [2003]).

The defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565-566 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 714 [1998]; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; People v Anderson, 305 AD2d 611, 612 [2003]). Schmidt, J.P., Rivera, Florio and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bethea, 46 A.D.3d 565, 845 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 565 (People v. Bethea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Edwards
741 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Henry
744 N.E.2d 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Darden
313 N.E.2d 49 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Brown
2 A.D.3d 1423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Anderson
305 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)