People v. Bester

79 N.E.2d 466, 297 N.Y. 408
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 22, 1948·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Trial Judge handed to the jury a chart listing “ the crimes submitted to you ” and directing the jury to consider such crimes in the order in which they are set forth on this Chart.” The sequence on the chart was as follows: “ Murder in the first degree, as a felony murder; murder in the first degree by premeditated and deliberate design; murder in the second degree; manslaughter in the first degree; manslaughter in the second degree ”. This procedure is now challenged by the defendant as being inconsistent with the opinion of Conway, J., in People v. Snyder (297 N. Y. 81, 90-91), but the proposition thus invoked (which had the support of three members of this court in the Snyder case) cannot here be considered, since the point is not presented by sufficient exceptions. (See Code Grim. Pro., § 420-a.)

The judgment should - be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bester, 79 N.E.2d 466, 297 N.Y. 408 (N.Y. 1948).

79 N.E.2d 466 (People v. Bester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lang
329 N.E.2d 176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Caverio
133 N.E.2d 512 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
People v. Feld
113 N.E.2d 440 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)