People v. Best

2018 NY Slip Op 1220

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: February 22, 2018
• Docket: 108162
• Status: Published

Opinion

People v Best (2018 NY Slip Op 01220)

People v Best

2018 NY Slip Op 01220

Decided on February 22, 2018

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: February 22, 2018

108162

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

KWESI D. BEST, Appellant.

Calendar Date: September 19, 2017
Before: Lynch, J.P., Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

Pamela B. Bleiwas, Ithaca, for appellant.

Stephen K. Cornwell Jr., District Attorney, Binghamton (Mariah Foster, Law Intern), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered November 2, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of assault in the first degree and attempted assault in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the first degree and attempted assault in the second degree stemming from his attack on two random individuals with a blade. Defendant was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of eight years on the first degree assault conviction and 1 to 3 years on the attempted assault conviction, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

We are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that extraordinary circumstances exist that render the sentences

imposed harsh and excessive. The record reflects that in imposing the sentences, County Court considered defendant's mental health issues and substance abuse history, as well as his expressed remorse for his conduct (see People v White, 104 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2013], lvs denied 21 NY3d 1018, 1021 [2013]; People v Duffy, 38 AD3d 1060, 1060 [2007]).

Lynch, J.P., Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.