People v. Best

162 A.D.2d 1056, 559 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Best. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D.2d 773

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a guilty plea, of two counts of driving while intoxicated as a felony. On January 4, 1989, he was sentenced to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years on each count, and on March 15, 1989, upon the People’s motion and over defendant’s objection, the court further provided that the sentence would run consecutively to an existing sentence. Defendant argues on appeal that the court lacked the power to correct the sentence, although he acknowledges that it was understood that the current sentence would run consecutively to his previous sentence, and that, in fact, the court waived a $500 fine based in part on that understanding. We find that the court had the inherent power to correct the error (see, People v Minaya, 54 NY2d 360, cert denied 455 US 1024). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.—felony driving while intoxicated.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Best, 162 A.D.2d 1056, 559 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

162 A.D.2d 1056 (People v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Minaya
429 N.E.2d 1161 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)