People v. Berzito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Berzito

261 A.D.2d 157, 687 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4636

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 157 (People v. Berzito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Berzito, 261 A.D.2d 157, 687 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J., on motion; Felice Shea, J., at plea and sentence), rendered October 14, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909). Accordingly, appellate review of the motion court’s summary denial of his suppression motion is foreclosed (People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570). In any event, the denial of the motion was proper. Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J., on motion; Felice Shea, J., at plea and sentence), rendered October 14, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909). Accordingly, appellate review of the motion court’s summary denial of his suppression motion is foreclosed (People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570). In any event, the denial of the motion was proper. Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 157, 687 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-berzito-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack