People v. Berry

27 A.D.3d 201, 809 N.Y.S.2d 456
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Berry. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 A.D.3d 1047

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J., at hearing; Daniel P. FitzGerald, J., at plea and sentence), rendered April 1, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3½ to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

[202]*202The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The People met their initial burden of coming forward, and defendant did not meet his ultimate burden of proving the illegality of the search and seizure (see People v Berrios, 28 NY2d 361, 367 [1971]). The evidence supports the conclusion that the trained and experienced narcotics officer observed conduct that he reasonably believed to be a drug transaction (see People v Jones, 90 NY2d 835 [1997]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Berry, 27 A.D.3d 201, 809 N.Y.S.2d 456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 201 (People v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
683 N.E.2d 14 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
People v. Berrios
28 N.Y.2d 361 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)