People v. Bernoff
This text of 54 N.E.2d 376 (People v. Bernoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All of the appellants above named were found guilty of conspiracy to extort and of various separate crimes of extortion. We conclude that as to appellants Bernoff, McAdam, Gabaeff, Taylor, Green, Blume and Murphy, the evidence is sufficient on all the counts on which they were found guilty and that there were no serious errors on the trial. As to appellants Lichtenstein and Buckley, however, we come to a different conclusion. As to appellant Lichtenstein there was no sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the' accomplice Kennedy and as to appellant Buckley there is no . sufficient showing that he knowingly joined the conspiracy or knowingly did anything to further it, or that he was guilty of any of the alleged acts of extortion.
As to the defendants Abraham Lichtenstein and Jeremiah Buckley the judgment should be reversed and the indictment dismissed as to them; as to the other defendants, the judgment should be affirmed. (See 292 N. Y. 642.)
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 N.E.2d 376, 292 N.Y. 230, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bernoff-ny-1944.