People v. Bernier

111 A.D.2d 762, 490 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50007
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 111 A.D.2d 762 (People v. Bernier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bernier, 111 A.D.2d 762, 490 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered October 24, 1980, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The People proved defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Two witnesses testified that they saw the defendant engaged in an argument with the victim in a grocery store. The defendant, without provocation, pulled a gun from his pocket and shot the victim twice in the head and neck. On appeal, defendant contends that the People’s witnesses were not credible because they had previously denied witnessing the shooting. Further, defendant argues their testimony was contradictory concerning whether defendant pulled a gun from his left or right pocket, and whether music playing in the store was too loud to hear the argument between defendant and the victim. Even if “certain inconsistencies appear in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, resolution of credibility as well as the weight to be given the defenses presented were properly for the trier of fact * * * [T]he facts adduced do not compel the conclusion that a reasonable doubt existed as a matter of law” (People v La Borde, 76 AD2d 869, 870).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised pro se, and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for our review. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Haile M.
160 A.D.2d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Johnson
149 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.D.2d 762, 490 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bernier-nyappdiv-1985.