People v. Bernard Viscount Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bernard Viscount Washington

250 A.D.2d 445, 672 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 445 (People v. Bernard Viscount Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bernard Viscount Washington, 250 A.D.2d 445, 672 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered June 13, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, rape in the first degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to two consecutive terms of SVs to 25 years concurrent with a term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied in all respects. The hearing evidence established that the evidence recovered from defendant’s person was seized incident to a lawful arrest, that the search of his apartment was based on consent, and that the evidence was properly subjected to testing (see, People v Natal, 75 NY2d 379, 383, cert denied 498 US 862).

On the existing record, which defendant has not sought to amplify by way of a CPL 440.10 motion, we conclude that defendant received effective assistance of counsel (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered June 13, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, rape in the first degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to two consecutive terms of SVs to 25 years concurrent with a term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied in all respects. The hearing evidence established that the evidence recovered from defendant’s person was seized incident to a lawful arrest, that the search of his apartment was based on consent, and that the evidence was properly subjected to testing (see, People v Natal, 75 NY2d 379, 383, cert denied 498 US 862).

On the existing record, which defendant has not sought to amplify by way of a CPL 440.10 motion, we conclude that defendant received effective assistance of counsel (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 445, 672 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bernard-viscount-washington-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack