People v. Bereziuk

203 A.D.2d 963, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4999

This text of 203 A.D.2d 963 (People v. Bereziuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bereziuk, 203 A.D.2d 963, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find no merit to defendant’s contention that the court [964]*964erred in failing, sua sponte, to order that defendant be examined pursuant to CPL 730.30 (1) to determine his fitness to proceed to trial (see, People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167, 171; People v Ross, 185 AD2d 661, lv denied 80 NY2d 934).

We decline to modify defendant’s sentence in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Armlin
332 N.E.2d 870 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Ross
185 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 963, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bereziuk-nyappdiv-1994.