People v. Berardo

5 A.D.2d 811, 170 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032

Opinion

Petitioner was removed upon written notice that did not specify adequately the charges he would be called upon to answer. Furthermore, the only witness who appeared against him did not testify under oath (People ex rel. Kasschau v. Police Comrs., 155 N. Y. 40; Matter of Hecht v. Monaghan, 307 N. Y. 461). The determination of respondent is annulled, and the matter is remanded for a new hearing in accordance with statutory requirements and upon specifications apprising petitioner properly of the nature of the charges made against him, that will supplement the inadequate notice previously given him. The suspension without pay presently in force will be continued. Costs to abide the event. Settle order.

Concur— Botein, P. J., Breitel, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Berardo, 5 A.D.2d 811, 170 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

5 A.D.2d 811 (People v. Berardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Kasschau v. Board of Police Commissioners
49 N.E. 257 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Hecht v. Monaghan
121 N.E.2d 421 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)