People v. Benzeno

83 A.D.3d 728, 919 N.Y.S.2d 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 5, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), imposed February 4, 2010, pursuant to CPL 440.46, after a hearing, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on April 11, 2003, the resentence being a determinate term of imprisonment of seven years and a period of postrelease supervision of three years.

Ordered that the resentence is modified, on the law, by vacating the period of postrelease supervision of three years; as so modified, the resentence is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for the imposition of an appropriate period of postrelease supervision in accordance with Penal Law § 70.45 (2) (b).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the term of imprisonment imposed was not excessive (see People v Schreter, 50 AD3d 930 [2008]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825, 826 [2007]; People [729]*729v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). However, as the People correctly concede, the three-year period of postrelease supervision imposed exceeds the statutorily authorized maximum (see Penal Law § 70.45 [2] [b]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the County Court, Suffolk County, for the imposition of an appropriate period of postrelease supervision in accordance with Penal Law § 70.45 (2) (b). Rivera, J.P., Chambers, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benzeno, 83 A.D.3d 728, 919 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

83 A.D.3d 728 (People v. Benzeno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ortiz
84 A.D.3d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)