People v. Benton

166 A.D.2d 912, 561 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12205
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On the record before us, defendant has not sustained her burden of demonstrating "the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations” for defense counsel’s failure to request a suppression hearing (People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709). Consequently, we cannot conclude that defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Rivera, supra). We have reviewed defen[913]*913dant’s other contentions of ineffective assistance of counsel made both in the main brief and in the pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. We also conclude that the verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree was supported by sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—CPL art 440.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benton, 166 A.D.2d 912, 561 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 912 (People v. Benton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benton
166 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)