People v. Benson

105 A.D.2d 1073, 482 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21156
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Benson. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 A.D.2d 470

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The facts established at trial were more than sufficient to permit an inference that defendant intended to participate in the robbery. Moreover, since the jury initially returned inconsistent verdicts which would have resulted in dismissing the count upon which defendant was found guilty (People v Gibson, 65 AD2d 235, cert den 444 US 861), the court correctly resubmitted the matter to the jury (CPL 310.50, subd 2). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flynn, J. — robbery, second degree). Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benson, 105 A.D.2d 1073, 482 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 1073 (People v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gibson
65 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Gibson v. New York
444 U.S. 861 (Supreme Court, 1979)