People v. Bensabeur

2021 NY Slip Op 02812, 194 A.D.3d 736, 143 N.Y.S.3d 562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 5, 2021
DocketInd. No. 4921/14
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02812 (People v. Bensabeur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bensabeur, 2021 NY Slip Op 02812, 194 A.D.3d 736, 143 N.Y.S.3d 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Bensabeur (2021 NY Slip Op 02812)
People v Bensabeur
2021 NY Slip Op 02812
Decided on May 5, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 5, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2018-12534
(Ind. No. 4921/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Sammy Bensabeur, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Leila Hull of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Nancy Hoppock of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Betty Williams, J., at plea; Joseph E. Gubbay, J., at sentence), rendered September 26, 2018, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, including the seriousness of the crime and the defendant's subsequent arrests, the denial of youthful offender treatment was a provident exercise of the Supreme Court's discretion (see People v Sutton, 184 AD3d 236, 246; People v Booker, 111 AD3d 759, 759-760).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brendon V.
210 A.D.3d 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 02812, 194 A.D.3d 736, 143 N.Y.S.3d 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bensabeur-nyappdiv-2021.