People v. Bennett

50 A.D.3d 1047, 854 N.Y.S.2d 904
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered October 17, 2006, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the defense counsel’s cross-examination of the complainant as to prior bad acts because counsel failed to establish a good-faith basis for this inquiry (see People v Olibencia, 45 AD3d 607 [2007]; People v Dellarocco, 115 AD2d 904, 905 [1985]; cf. People v Jones, 193 AD2d 696, 697 [1993]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Miller and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bennett, 50 A.D.3d 1047, 854 N.Y.S.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

50 A.D.3d 1047 (People v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lebovits
94 A.D.3d 1146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Arriaga
77 A.D.3d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)