People v. Bennett

112 A.D.2d 243, 492 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55989
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bennett. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.2d 540

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), rendered August 30, 1983, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

[244]*244Defendant’s challenge to the plea allocution has not been preserved for appellate review on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction because of his failure to move to withdraw the plea prior to sentencing pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3) (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858). Nor do we deem it appropriate to review this issue pursuant to our authority to review unpreserved issues in the interest of justice. Finally, we find no justification for modifying this negotiated sentence (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bennett, 112 A.D.2d 243, 492 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

112 A.D.2d 243 (People v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Claudio
476 N.E.2d 644 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)