People v. Bennett

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Bennett

173 N.W.2d 830, 20 Mich. App. 166, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 805

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 25, 1969

DocketDocket 5,497

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 173 N.W.2d 830 (People v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bennett, 173 N.W.2d 830, 20 Mich. App. 166, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 805 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

R. B. Burns, J.

February, 1956, defendant was convicted by a jury of second-degree murder (MCLA § 750.317 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549]) and sentenced to 10 to 40 years’ imprisonment. Beginning in 1957, while tbe reporter was still alive, defendant made various requests for a transcript, which included writing to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, but he never received a transcript.

Before the adoption of our Michigan Constitution of 1963, the defendant did not have an absolute right to appeal his conviction, nor were there provisions for appointment of appellate counsel or for the furnishing of transcripts to indigents. Const 1963, art 1, § 20 gave persons convicted of crimes an absolute right to appeal the conviction, and procedures were adopted for the appointment of appellate counsel and for furnishing transcripts to indigent defendants.

Defendant was released on parole on three different occasions. He was paroled in May, 1962, and returned to prison as a parole violator a year later. He was paroled a second time in February, 1964, and again returned as a parole violator in November, 1964. He was paroled a third time in *168 September, 1965, and returned as a parole violator in May, 1966.

Defendant claims he was not aware of his rig'ht to appellate counsel until 1967, and he requested counsel March 27, 1967, about a month and a half after the reporter’s death on February 8, 1967. The reporter’s notes could not be located and defendant claims that because he cannot obtain a transcript of the original trial for review, he is entitled to a new trial.

Oral argument was heard during the May, 1969 term of this Court. The trial judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney were all alive and the case was remanded to the circuit court with instructions to the parties to attempt to settle the record in the cause pursuant to OCR 1963, 812.2(b), which states in part, “Where there is no stenographic record of the proceedings in the trial court, a settled record shall be used in lieu thereof * * *”

The settled record has been submitted to this Court and after a review of it, we find no error.

Affirmed.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. B. Burns, J.

February, 1956, defendant was convicted by a jury of second-degree murder (MCLA § 750.317 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549]) and sentenced to 10 to 40 years’ imprisonment. Beginning in 1957, while tbe reporter was still alive, defendant made various requests for a transcript, which included writing to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, but he never received a transcript.

Before the adoption of our Michigan Constitution of 1963, the defendant did not have an absolute right to appeal his conviction, nor were there provisions for appointment of appellate counsel or for the furnishing of transcripts to indigents. Const 1963, art 1, § 20 gave persons convicted of crimes an absolute right to appeal the conviction, and procedures were adopted for the appointment of appellate counsel and for furnishing transcripts to indigent defendants.

Defendant was released on parole on three different occasions. He was paroled in May, 1962, and returned to prison as a parole violator a year later. He was paroled a second time in February, 1964, and again returned as a parole violator in November, 1964. He was paroled a third time in *168 September, 1965, and returned as a parole violator in May, 1966.

Defendant claims he was not aware of his rig'ht to appellate counsel until 1967, and he requested counsel March 27, 1967, about a month and a half after the reporter’s death on February 8, 1967. The reporter’s notes could not be located and defendant claims that because he cannot obtain a transcript of the original trial for review, he is entitled to a new trial.

Oral argument was heard during the May, 1969 term of this Court. The trial judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney were all alive and the case was remanded to the circuit court with instructions to the parties to attempt to settle the record in the cause pursuant to OCR 1963, 812.2(b), which states in part, “Where there is no stenographic record of the proceedings in the trial court, a settled record shall be used in lieu thereof * * *”

The settled record has been submitted to this Court and after a review of it, we find no error.

Affirmed.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 N.W.2d 830, 20 Mich. App. 166, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bennett-michctapp-1969.

Opinion

R. B. Burns, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack