People v. Benjamin

123 A.D.3d 837, 996 N.Y.S.2d 543
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 2014·No. 2011-08420·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Morgenstern, J.), rendered April 28, 2011, convicting him of criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]; see Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]), and we have also reviewed the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief. Counsel has informed this Court that the defendant is unwilling to raise any contention on appeal that, if successful, would result in further proceedings which might possibly subject him to a risk of receiving a sentence Lon *838 ger than the one that he has already served. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no remaining nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is therefore granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; see also People v Cardwell, 98 AD3d 986 [2012]; People v Belton, 74 AD3d 834 [2010]).

Mastro, J.P., Roman, Miller and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benjamin, 123 A.D.3d 837, 996 N.Y.S.2d 543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

123 A.D.3d 837 (People v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
210 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)