People v. Benitez
This text of 84 A.D.3d 826 (People v. Benitez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Rooney, J.), rendered November 14, 2007, convicting him of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that he [827]*827was deprived of his right to testify before the grand jury (see People v DeLuca, 45 AD3d 777 [2007]; People v Standley, 269 AD2d 614, 615 [2000]).
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was, in fact, imposed, was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 281 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; People v Timberlake, 82 AD3d 1134 [2011]; People v Lewis, 73 AD3d 1212 [2010]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.3d 826, 922 N.Y.S.2d 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-benitez-nyappdiv-2011.