People v. Benitez-Fernandez

96 A.D.3d 1666, 946 N.Y.S.2d 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Benitez-Fernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.3d 1665
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 2012·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), entered July 6, 2010 pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act. The order denied defendant’s application to be resentenced upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in People v Benitez-Fernandez ([appeal [1667]*1667No. 1] 96 AD3d 1665 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benitez-Fernandez, 96 A.D.3d 1666, 946 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 1666 (People v. Benitez-Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benitez-Fernandez
96 A.D.3d 1665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)