People v. Benham
This text of 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 225 (People v. Benham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court were of the same opinion. They observed I there was a well-known and acknowledged difference between a capias, fi. fa. &c.,’and:'a landlord’s warrant: that j one was public process—the process of the people, and / the other was a mere personal authority derived from the ij landlord ; that the process of the people would effectually 'j protect an officer in the faithful execution of it; but that in, the other case, the officer had no other authority but that I derived from the landlord; and if he had no right to make ■ a distress, he could not convey such a right to an officer, ’ or any other person; and it made no difference whether J the landlord himself distrained upon the tenant, or whether he deputed his authority to another.
The defendants were acquitted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-benham-nyctcompl-1823.