People v. Beltre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Beltre

266 A.D.2d 306, 698 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11291

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 306 (People v. Beltre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Beltre, 266 A.D.2d 306, 698 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered January 22, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not err in denying the motion to sever the trial of the defendant and his codefendant (see, People v Cardwell, 78 NY2d 996; People v Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174). In any event, any error in this regard was harmless in light of the overwhelming proof of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, S. Miller and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered January 22, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not err in denying the motion to sever the trial of the defendant and his codefendant (see, People v Cardwell, 78 NY2d 996; People v Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174). In any event, any error in this regard was harmless in light of the overwhelming proof of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, S. Miller and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 306, 698 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beltre-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack