People v. Bello

201 A.D.2d 661, 609 N.Y.S.2d 822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bello. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D.2d 657

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered July 8, 1992, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence, in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Bracken, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bello, 201 A.D.2d 661, 609 N.Y.S.2d 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Bello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)