People v. Bellizzi

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bellizzi

108 Misc. 2d 209, 441 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2927

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 Misc. 2d 209 (People v. Bellizzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bellizzi, 108 Misc. 2d 209, 441 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction is unanimously reversed, on the law, information dismissed and fine remitted.

While the general reliability of radar as a competent speed detection device, while in a stationary position, has long been recognized (People v Magri, 3 NY2d 562), the reliability of this particular type of unit to accurately measure the speed of an oncoming vehicle while the unit is located in a police car traveling in the opposite direction has not been established. Before such readings can be considered reliable, there must be testimony detailing the operative principles underlying the capability of this type of radar unit to accurately compensate for the relative speeds and directions of the respective vehicles (People v Mangelberg, NYLJ, Nov. 21, 1977, p 14, col 5; People v Lampert, NYLJ, May 31, 1977, p 14, col 2; cf. People v [210]*210Sachs, 1 Misc 2d 148, cited with approval in People v Heyser, 2 NY2d 390).

Concur: Farley, P. J., Pittoni and Slifkin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction is unanimously reversed, on the law, information dismissed and fine remitted.

While the general reliability of radar as a competent speed detection device, while in a stationary position, has long been recognized (People v Magri, 3 NY2d 562), the reliability of this particular type of unit to accurately measure the speed of an oncoming vehicle while the unit is located in a police car traveling in the opposite direction has not been established. Before such readings can be considered reliable, there must be testimony detailing the operative principles underlying the capability of this type of radar unit to accurately compensate for the relative speeds and directions of the respective vehicles (People v Mangelberg, NYLJ, Nov. 21, 1977, p 14, col 5; People v Lampert, NYLJ, May 31, 1977, p 14, col 2; cf. People v [210]*210Sachs, 1 Misc 2d 148, cited with approval in People v Heyser, 2 NY2d 390).

Concur: Farley, P. J., Pittoni and Slifkin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 Misc. 2d 209, 441 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bellizzi-nyappterm-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack