People v. Belle
270 A.D.2d 354, 704 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Belle. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 A.D.2d 143 →
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Corso, J.), rendered December 10, 1997.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant effectively waived appellate review of the is[355]*355sue he now seeks to raise as part of his plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Belle, 270 A.D.2d 354, 704 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
270 A.D.2d 354 (People v. Belle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)