People v. Bellavicini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bellavicini

173 A.D. 950

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

—Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. No opinion. Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Stapleton, J., dissented on the ground that, although there is competent evidence of an isolated, indecent or obscene act, and it is inferable that defendant saw (heard) it, there is no evidence that painted men with effeminate voices resorted there with the knowledge of this defendant; the evidence is insufficient to convict the defendant of the crime charged. Jenks, P. J., concurred, with Stapleton, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. No opinion. Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Stapleton, J., dissented on the ground that, although there is competent evidence of an isolated, indecent or obscene act, and it is inferable that defendant saw (heard) it, there is no evidence that painted men with effeminate voices resorted there with the knowledge of this defendant; the evidence is insufficient to convict the defendant of the crime charged. Jenks, P. J., concurred, with Stapleton, J.

People v. Bellavicini, 173 A.D. 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 950 (People v. Bellavicini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.