People v. Bellamy

298 A.D.2d 459, 748 N.Y.S.2d 271, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered April 26, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [460]*460withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any non-frivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bellamy, 298 A.D.2d 459, 748 N.Y.S.2d 271, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

298 A.D.2d 459 (People v. Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)