People v. Bellamy

104 A.D.2d 825, 480 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20306
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bellamy. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 A.D.2d 654

Opinion

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fiber, J.), rendered January 11, 1983, affirmed.

The instant record reveals that defendant was represented by counsel, that he had neither been threatened nor coerced into pleading guilty, that he discussed the plea with the court, that he understood the rights he was waiving by foregoing a trial, that he acknowledged the facts of the crime, and that the plea bargain was fair. Accordingly, we affirm (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert den sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, O’Connor and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bellamy, 104 A.D.2d 825, 480 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 825 (People v. Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nixon
234 N.E.2d 687 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Robinson v. New York
393 U.S. 1067 (Supreme Court, 1969)