People v. Bell

123 A.D.3d 1050, 997 N.Y.S.2d 331
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 A.D.3d 718
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 2014·No. 2012-09656·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed October 28, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Pressley, 116 AD3d 794 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his claim that his sentence was excessive. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bell, 123 A.D.3d 1050, 997 N.Y.S.2d 331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

123 A.D.3d 1050 (People v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Pressley
116 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)