People v. Bell

137 A.D.2d 606, 524 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1004
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 A.D.2d 926

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), rendered October 15, 1986, convicting her of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered, that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that a single improper summation comment by the prosecutor deprived her of a fair trial. We find, however, that the alleged instance of misconduct—in [607]*607respect to which defense counsel’s objection was immediately sustained—does not warrant reversal under the circumstances (see, People v Brown, 128 AD2d 542; People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, affd 65 NY2d 837). Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bell, 137 A.D.2d 606, 524 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

137 A.D.2d 606 (People v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Roopchand
107 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Brown
128 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)